The Wagon Wheel effect
Monday, February 25th, 2008On Thursday, Louise and I took the kids to The Natural History Museum in London. It was a long and tiring day out but I think they enjoyed it. I think that when it comes to museums, children are generally either too young to fully appreciate them or too old to be interested, but you’ve got to try — Parent’s Mantra No. 5.
It was certainly a lot easier than previous forays into London as this time there was no buggy to haul up and down steps, especially in the Underground. Now that Jessica is three, we’re certainly becoming more mobile.
The one thing that really struck me during the visit was the size of the exhibits. The museum falls into two halves, logically if not physically. Lots of modern “educational” displays — explanations, diagrams, videos, buttons to push — on one side and ageing exhibits in glass cases — animal, vegetable, mineral — on the other. Interestingly, the children were far more interested in the latter, perhaps because they are so much more immediate.
What I couldn’t get over, though, was the size of the animal exhibits. Everything looked so small. The lion just didn’t look lion sized. Neither did the polar bear look polar bear sized. The Blue Whale… what was I expecting? I don’t know. Okay, the elephant looked pretty elephantine, I’ll grant you.
So, why was this? I can think of three reasons.
First, back in the day, the museum’s hunters went round shooting adolescent specimens because the fully sized buggers were far too scary. Second, they’ve shrunk as I’ve got older, just like Wagon Wheels. Third, Hollywood special effects have rotted my brain with extra large “monsters” on screen, in the same way that they use elk in place of reindeer because the latter aren’t impressive enough. Much as I’d like to blame Hollywood for everything, I suspect it’s a combination of all three.